BIAFRA : The Scam In the Biafran Agitation Process, By Michael Owhoko

BIAFRA The Biafra people have a right to pursue their dreams, but this should be done within the context of their territorial boundaries without any intention or ambition of annexing other regions or any part thereof as part of their geographical area. It is this element that makes the current agitation for the sovereign state of Biafra a scam.

Where is the map of Biafra? This is the question I have often asked the promoters and sympathisers of the Biafra cause, and up till this moment, their responses have been feeble, vague, evasive and suspicious; failing to provide a specific drawing showing a clearly defined territorial area called Biafra.

Why is the map of a potential sovereign state like the Republic of Biafra not being courageously and freely displayed, like the way the flag is routinely presented? The recurring sight of the Biafra flag raises consciousness of it; once Biafra is mentioned, a mental picture of the flag pops, showing the rising sun along with the eleven rays symbolising the provinces of Biafra. But where is the map?

I am asking this question because of concerns being raised by neighbours sharing boundaries with the South-East states to the South, specifically, the Niger Delta region. The fears of the Niger Delta people stem from its minority status and experience in the first separatist agitation and subsequent declaration of the former Eastern Region of Nigeria as an independent state of Biafra.

At the time, the present day Akwa Ibom, Cross River, Rivers and Bayelsa States were part of the former Eastern Region, while Delta and Edo States, known as the Midwest Region, were captured by the Biafra forces and declared as the Republic of Benin, even though, in their hearts, the region was part of Biafra, despite the prevailing plural identities.

Indeed, this was the only reason why these states were sucked into the Biafra struggle without known prior consultation and consensus. However, to allay the fears of the minorities and reassure them that they were safe within the Biafra union, Late Lt-Col. Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu then appointed late Major-General Philip Effiong, a minority from the present day Akwa Ibom State, as second-in-command in the Biafra hierarchy.

The geo-political setting of the country has since metamorphosed from the four-regional structure to a six-geo-political grouping, in consonant with ethnic, linguistic, cultural, historical, coupled with contiguous boundaries and affinity, leaving the Igbo in the South-East geopolitical zone, and the minorities in the South-South or Niger Delta geopolitical area.

The present day agitation for the sovereign state of Biafra – both the faction led by the Movement for the Sovereign State of Biafra (MOSSOB) and the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and their leaders – have, at different events, expressed that the South-South geo-political zone or Niger Delta region is part of Biafra.

This position is stripped of respect for minorities and a demonstration of might in the quest for territorial expansion. How do you conscript an unwilling people from another region to be part of your conceived independent state without prior discussions and agreement on the form, organisation and modality of administration? Even if this is an effect of hallucination, how then can you be trusted?

The rising sun on the Biafra flag, with the eleven rays representing the eleven provinces of Biafra under the old Eastern Region, is also misleading. The Niger Delta region is no more part of the South-East geopolitical zone. The moment the old four-regional structure was dismantled and replaced with the six-geopolitical zones, the eleven provinces ceased to exist…

It is this fear of domination and territorial ambition by the major ethnic groups that led to the setting up of the Willink Commission in 1957 to look into the fears of the minorities who were scared of the imbalance of the three-regional political structure, and this led to the creation of the fourth region, the Midwest in 1963. By their body language, the Biafra gladiators are provoking a reenactment reminiscent of the old political structure.

Perhaps, the drivers of Biafra are still living in the past, unable to come to terms with reality that the Niger Delta is now a different geo-political area with its distinct political aspirations. Perhaps, they are being misled by the word ‘Biafra’ and the symbol of the Biafran flag.

The name, Biafra, has its origin from the Bight of Biafra, now Gulf of Guinea, a Portuguese name representing the West Coast from where waters flow into the Atlantic Ocean. Biafra still conjures a false sense of one region based on the old four-regional structure. The word, Biafra, no longer has geographical and historical relevance to the present South-East geopolitical area, but the South-South geopolitical grouping.

The rising sun on the Biafra flag, with the eleven rays representing the eleven provinces of Biafra under the old Eastern Region, is also misleading. The Niger Delta region is no more part of the South-East geopolitical zone. The moment the old four-regional structure was dismantled and replaced with the six-geopolitical zones, the eleven provinces ceased to exist, and therefore can no longer be reflected on the Biafra flag, particularly when previous political affinities have also been terminated.

Unfortunately, the continued use of the symbol on the flag creates a false sense of one region in the minds of the protagonists of Biafra, with its eleven provinces. It is time to recreate the map; otherwise, it is a scam.

Under the current dispensation, the different geopolitical zones, having their distinct socio-economic and political aspirations, are now at liberty to develop at their individual paces. This does not, however, exclude two or more geopolitical areas forming an alliance in furtherance of their social, political and economic ambitions, if they so wish, but this would be preceded and predicated upon a free collaboration negotiated from a position of equality and respect for one another.

Governance is easy if one has nothing to hide. The process becomes complex and difficult when there are hidden motives and cover ups by entrenched interests. Why are the drivers of the sovereign state of Biafra not making the Biafra map public and visible? We see the flag, but where is the map? Or is this a strategy to smuggle the Niger-Delta region into the Biafra dream through the backdoor?

Biafra needs to review its strategies and restore confidence among neighbouring boundaries, otherwise, a case of territorial ambition and annexation are implied, a discernment that is capable of thwarting and rendering its efforts unfeasible.

As minorities, the South-South geo-political area also has a right to assert itself, particularly in line with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), as adopted on September 13, 2007, within the context of their dignity, culture and survival as a people. Besides, the United Nations Charter in Article 1 also recognises the right of a people to self-determination for the realisation of their cultural, economic, social and political dreams.

It was on the basis of this that President Muhammadu Buhari, as a military head of state in 1984, supported the aspirations and right of the Sahrawi people for self-determination and independence, despite the opposition of the Morocco’s government. Buhari’s position then was on the basis of the resolutions of the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) on Western Sahara at the time.

The Niger Delta is no longer a kindergarten region. It has all the resources required to deliver on its responsibilities as an independent state, if it so desires in line with the wishes of the people. Thus, the scramble for the region by other regions for purposes of annexation is an exercise in futility. If in the event that emerging development in the country makes separatist agitation inevitable in the future, the Niger Delta region is capable of governing itself as an independent sovereign state.
It is the right of people to pursue their collective aspirations, particularly if they believe their common interest is being violated or endangered in a federation. The Biafra people have a right to pursue their dreams, but this should be done within the context of their territorial boundaries without any intention or ambition of annexing other regions or any part thereof as part of their geographical area. It is this element that makes the current agitation for the sovereign state of Biafra a scam.

Most countries that have attained independence today started with a struggle for self-determination, a process aimed at controlling their socio-economic and political destiny. Once a decision is reached among a people to form a state, implicitly, there must be a delineated territory agreed as a sovereign boundary, and a government capable of meeting the needs of the people that could also interface with other countries.

Once this is settled, the next natural thing to do is to draw up a map depicting the proposed independent territory, even before a flag and other paraphernalia are developed. This has been the trend in the struggle for self-determination. Apart from sensitisation, the map and the flag are used as symbols of appeal to shape and drive sentiments and collective aspirations of the people.

This same process was adopted by countries that had gained independence and those still in the trenches for independence. Thus, from Scotland to Catalonia, from Hong Kong to Siberia, from Tibet to Luhansk and from Crimea to Quebec, this is the pattern and trend.

Biafra needs to review its strategies and restore confidence among neighbouring boundaries, otherwise, a case of territorial ambition and annexation are implied, a discernment that is capable of thwarting and rendering its efforts unfeasible.