Buhari blames clerics for attraction to terrorism

 
President Muhammadu Buhari has blamed the seeming inability to tame the activities of insurgents to the role of clerics whose insidious preachings continue to attract members into their fold. 
A statement signed yesterday by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, said President Buhari spoke in Jordan at a security meeting hosted by King Abdullah II where he urged Muslim leaders worldwide to speak up against the hateful violence committed by deranged people in the name of Islam.
Buhari, who reiterated the commitment of Nigeria to playing a leading role in bringing together countries of the West African sub-region in a collective security arrangement, said that with what the nation had gone through, it was ready to share the experiences with a view to fashioning out comprehensive action plans in tackling the scourge of violent extremism in the region

He said that the joint regional collaboration under the auspices of the multinational joint task force, combined with the efforts of the Nigerian Armed Forces, had gone a long way to decimate the activities of extremists in the West African sub-region.
Participants at the end of the meeting resolved to come up with concrete action plans that would change the narrative of violent extremism in the West African sub-region at a follow-up meeting to be hosted by Nigeria.
Meanwhile, the Borno State Police Commissioner, Damian Chukwu, has confirmed the killing of 13 people and several others wounded after two suspected female bombers detonated their strapped Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) at the weekend at Biu Central Market in the state.
The two suicide bombers were also killed in the attack.Chukwu, in a statement, said: “Two female suicide bombers infiltrated and gained entry into Biu town. One of the bombers detonated an IED (improvised explosive device) strapped to her body within Biu’s main market, while the other one detonated outside the market square.”
But a member of the Civilian Joint Task Force (JTF), Madu Jasku, told The Guardian on phone yesterday that the death toll might rise to 21, as some of the injured ones were placed on danger list while being evacuated to the hospital for treatment.
However, Arewa leaders, under the aegis of Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), have condemned the attack.They described the recent act by the remnants of Boko Haram sect using innocent children to perpetrate bombings in the state “as wicked and barbaric.”

When Biafra defeated Nigeria at london courtn

Leader of Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu The Appeal court judgement on the case read by Lord Denning in Agbor v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner (reported in the London Weekly Law Reports, Vol. 1 of 1968), makes a compelling reading. Lord Denning said …”There is a civil war flaring in Nigeria. Sparks from it have come down in London. Some have landed on No. 35 Woodstock Road, London, NW 11. In 1965, the house was bought by the government of the Eastern Region of Nigeria. It was occupied by one of their senior officers. In 1966, a Federal Military Government was set up in Nigeria. It was then arranged that an officer of the Federal Government of Nigeria should occupy the ground floor of No. 35 Woodstock road, while the first floor of No. 35 Woodstock road, remained occupied by an officer of the Eastern region. Afterwards, civil war broke up in Nigeria. The Eastern Region seceded. It calls itself the Republic of Biafra. But this house remained occupied as before. The Federal officer was on the ground floor. The Biafran officer was on the first floor. “Now, we come to January of this year, 1969. On the ground floor, there was a Mohammed, who was on the Diplomatic staff of the Federal Government of Nigeria. On the first floor was a Mr Onuma, who regarded himself as being employed by the Republic of Biafra. Mr Mohammed on the ground floor decided to leave. But the Nigerian High Commission still intended to keep possession of the ground floor. They arranged for decorators to come in. They intended, after the decorators had finished, to put another of their officers at the ground floor. On the very day Mr Mohammed left, the decorators came in. But they left at 9.00 o’clock at night. They left the place locked up. But the Biafrans on the top floor had been keeping watch. They knew that Mr Mohammed had gone. They had themselves got a key of the ground floor. They got into the ground floor and installed a family of the Biafrans into it. They put in Mrs Agbor, her husband and six children. The family occupied the ground floor. An hour later, two men came from the Nigerian High Commission. They tried to get into the ground floor. But the Biafrans kept them out. On the next day, January 5, 1969, some 20 Nigerians came and sought to turn out the Biafrans but the police persuaded them to go away. The Biafrans then went to their Solicitors, Linklaters and Paines. They wrote to the Nigerian High Commission, which did nothing to evict Mrs Agbor and her family. Then, suddenly on March 7, early in the morning, the police came and told her she must leave. They said they were authorised by the Home Office on behalf of the Nigerian High Commission. The police officers bundled her out of the house, including her husband and children. Her Solicitors issued a writ on her behalf to challenge this eviction. They asked for an order to restore her back to the house. The judge in chambers refused to make such an order. They then went to the court of appeal. The appeal court ruled in favour of Mrs Agbor. Said Lord Denning:” The plain fact here is that Mr and Mrs Agbor’s claim of right to be entitled to the the possession of the ground floor of the house. They entered by stealth. They used a key that had been left behind. But they did it under a claim of right. It may be that they had no such right as they claimed. But even so, the proper way to evict her was by application to a court of law. No one is entitled to take possession of premises by strange hand or with a multitude of people. This has been forbidden since the statute of Richard 11 against forcible entry…The police must not take laws into their hands. If she must be turned out, it has to be by due process of law and not by action of the executive…In my judgement, this court should make an interim order that she be restored to her possession of this flat. I would allow the appeal accordingly.”

Read more at: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/11/biafra-defeated-nigeria-london-court/

Leader of Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu The Appeal court judgement on the case read by Lord Denning in Agbor v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner (reported in the London Weekly Law Reports, Vol. 1 of 1968), makes a compelling reading. Lord Denning said …”There is a civil war flaring in Nigeria. Sparks from it have come down in London. Some have landed on No. 35 Woodstock Road, London, NW 11. In 1965, the house was bought by the government of the Eastern Region of Nigeria. It was occupied by one of their senior officers. In 1966, a Federal Military Government was set up in Nigeria. It was then arranged that an officer of the Federal Government of Nigeria should occupy the ground floor of No. 35 Woodstock road, while the first floor of No. 35 Woodstock road, remained occupied by an officer of the Eastern region. Afterwards, civil war broke up in Nigeria. The Eastern Region seceded. It calls itself the Republic of Biafra. But this house remained occupied as before. The Federal officer was on the ground floor. The Biafran officer was on the first floor. “Now, we come to January of this year, 1969. On the ground floor, there was a Mohammed, who was on the Diplomatic staff of the Federal Government of Nigeria. On the first floor was a Mr Onuma, who regarded himself as being employed by the Republic of Biafra. Mr Mohammed on the ground floor decided to leave. But the Nigerian High Commission still intended to keep possession of the ground floor. They arranged for decorators to come in. They intended, after the decorators had finished, to put another of their officers at the ground floor. On the very day Mr Mohammed left, the decorators came in. But they left at 9.00 o’clock at night. They left the place locked up. But the Biafrans on the top floor had been keeping watch. They knew that Mr Mohammed had gone. They had themselves got a key of the ground floor. They got into the ground floor and installed a family of the Biafrans into it. They put in Mrs Agbor, her husband and six children. The family occupied the ground floor. An hour later, two men came from the Nigerian High Commission. They tried to get into the ground floor. But the Biafrans kept them out. On the next day, January 5, 1969, some 20 Nigerians came and sought to turn out the Biafrans but the police persuaded them to go away. The Biafrans then went to their Solicitors, Linklaters and Paines. They wrote to the Nigerian High Commission, which did nothing to evict Mrs Agbor and her family. Then, suddenly on March 7, early in the morning, the police came and told her she must leave. They said they were authorised by the Home Office on behalf of the Nigerian High Commission. The police officers bundled her out of the house, including her husband and children. Her Solicitors issued a writ on her behalf to challenge this eviction. They asked for an order to restore her back to the house. The judge in chambers refused to make such an order. They then went to the court of appeal. The appeal court ruled in favour of Mrs Agbor. Said Lord Denning:” The plain fact here is that Mr and Mrs Agbor’s claim of right to be entitled to the the possession of the ground floor of the house. They entered by stealth. They used a key that had been left behind. But they did it under a claim of right. It may be that they had no such right as they claimed. But even so, the proper way to evict her was by application to a court of law. No one is entitled to take possession of premises by strange hand or with a multitude of people. This has been forbidden since the statute of Richard 11 against forcible entry…The police must not take laws into their hands. If she must be turned out, it has to be by due process of law and not by action of the executive…In my judgement, this court should make an interim order that she be restored to her possession of this flat. I would allow the appeal accordingly.”

Read more at: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/11/biafra-defeated-nigeria-london-court/

I have read the positions of both parties over the alleged forceful eviction of Mrs Tejuosho and her family from her house by the agents of Lagos State government and/or of Lagos State House of Assembly. I don’t know who is right or wrong. Since the matter is in court, we await the decision of the court. What is however trite is that you can’t evict someone from an abode, even an illegal occupant, without a court order. Unfortunately, supporters from both sides of the divide, are digging in. I am not interested in their politics. Just that the due process be followed. I remember the famous case of OJUKWU v. LAGOS STATE GOVERNMENT over the forceful eviction of the Ikemba from his Villaska lodge (29 Queens drive, Ikoyi, Lagos) during the pendency of the case initiated by Ojukwu to stop his eviction. Ojukwu had on October 10, 1985, filed an ex parte application to restrain the military Governor from ejecting him and his family. From the High court, it went to the court of appeal. But during the pendency of the appeal, the Lagos State government evicted Ojukwu. The court ordered the Lagos State government to restore Ojukwu to the house, an ORDER that was ignored by the government. Rather, it went to the Supreme court which led to the term “Executive lawlessness” by Kayode Eso, JSC in his leading judgement. A similar scenario played out during Nigeria’s civil war. As the clatter of fireworks raged on during Nigeria’s civil war 50 years ago, unknown to Nigerians, the Biafran and Nigerian governments were also pursuing the case at a British court.

Read more at: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/11/biafra-defeated-nigeria-london-court/

IPOB to open headquarters in Germany

 
The Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, has announced that it would on 8th and 9th December launch its headquarters in Langenfeld, Germany.
The group said it became necessary to open headquarters so as to be able to coordinate its activities from across the world.
Emma Powerful, the group’s Media and Publicity Secretary in a press release on Thursday, said the public opening of the headquarters would be done by IPOB Deputy Leader, Uche Mefor, and all members of the ruling Directorate of State (DOS) on the 8th and 9th of December 2017 in Langenfeld Germany.
The statement partly reads, “Due to increased global awareness generated by the activities of the lPOB and the need to effectively harness the positive attention this has brought on the activities of our movement, we the family members of IPOB and it’s leadership worldwide wish to proudly announce the public opening of our brand new official world administrative headquarters.”
Powerful said the ceremony would demonstrate the commitment and zeal of IPOB to meet the administrative challenges of its renewed diplomatic offensive and demands of the upcoming mid-2018 independence referendum of the territory of Biafra.
“It will also serve as notice to all friends and well wishers of Biafra that Langenfel, Germany is now the one and only officially recognised world headquarters of IPOB from which every authentic information regarding the agitation for Biafra liberation will emanate from.
“The public is hereby warned to desist from corresponding with any other office except the one in Langenfeld, Germany.
“We however must point out that IPOB have official regional liaison offices in London in United Kingdom, Tel Aviv in Israel, Ankara in Turkey, New Delhi in India, Los Angeles, California in USA with many more expected to open in major countries of the world before the last quarter of 2018.
“These offices will continue to serve as regional points of contact but are not authorised to issue any diplomatic directive. That prerogative is the exclusive preserve of the world headquarters in Langenfeld, Germany under the direct supervision of Mazi Chika Edoziem the Head of the Directorate of State of the Indigenous People of Biafra.
“Any correspondence from any other quarter not sanctioned by Langenfeld, Germany and signed by Mazi Edoziem should be regarded as fake and inauthentic,” Powerful added.
IPOB said the move was in preparation of an expected referendum, which it said would be conducted next year.

I killed Bob Marley, Dying CIA Agent confesses

A retired officer of the CIA, Bill Oxley, has made a series of stunning confessions since he was admitted to the Mercy Hospital in Maine on Monday and told he has weeks to live. He claims he committed 17 assassinations for the American government between 1974 and 1985, including the music icon Bob Marley.

Mr. Oxley, who worked for the CIA for 29 years as an operative with top-level security clearances, claims he was often used as a hitman by the organization, to assassinate individuals who could represent a threat to the goals of the agency.

Trained as a sniper and marksman, Mr. Oxley also has significant experience with more unconventional methods of inflicting harm upon others, like poisons, explosives, induced heart attacks and cancer.

The 79-year-old operative claims he committed the assassinations between March 1974 and August 1985, at a time when he says the CIA “was a law unto itself.” He says he was part of an operative cell of three members which carried out political assassinations across the country and occasionally in foreign countries.

Most of their victims were political activists, journalists, and union leaders, but he also confesses to assassinating a few scientists, medical researchers, artists and musicians whose ideas and influence “represented a threat to the interests of the United States.”

He claims he had no problem with going through with the assassination of Bob Marley, because “I was a patriot, I believed in the CIA, and I didn’t question the motivation of the agency. I’ve always understood that sometimes sacrifices have to be made for the greater good.”

But Mr. Oxley confesses that Bob Marley remains unique among his victims, as he was the only victim he “felt anything for.”

“The others were assholes. Bob Marley was Bob Marley. I was no closer to being a long-haired hippy back then than I am now, but I must admit Bob’s music did move me. It held some power over me.”

He claims to have “mixed feelings” about Bob Marley’s death. On the one hand, Marley was “a good man, a beautiful soul” with “profound artistic gifts” who did not deserve to have his life cut short. But according to Mr. Oxley, Bob Marley was also placing the goals of the CIA in jeopardy and threatening the existence of the United States:

“He was succeeding in creating a revolution that used music as a more powerful tool than bullets and bombs. Bob Marley in 1976 was a very serious threat to the global status quo and to the hidden power brokers implementing their plan for a new world order. As far as the agency was concerned, Bob Marley was too successful, too famous, too influential… A Jamaican Rastaman who started using his funds and fame to support causes around the world that were in direct conflict with the CIA… To be honest, he signed his own death warrant.” 

“It’s not like we didn’t warn him. We sent a few guys to shoot up his house in Kingston,” Mr Oxley says, referring to a shooting in the Marley residence that left the singer with an injured arm and chest. “We had a message for him. We impressed upon him the gravity of the situation he found himself in. He didn’t listen.”

“Two days later, in the mountains, I stuck him with the pin.“

How Bob Marley was murdered by the CIA

Two days after Bob Marley was shot in the left arm by one of three gunmen who ambushed the singer and some of his crew in his house in Kingston, and after a brief stint in hospital, Bob Marley travelled to the protective hills of the Blue Mountains and spent time at the highest point in Jamaica, rehearsing for an upcoming concert.

According to Mr. Oxley, he used press credentials to gain access to Bob Marley during his Blue Mountains retreat. He introduced himself as a famous photographer working for the New York Times, and gave Bob Marley a gift.

“I gave him a pair of Converse All Stars. Size 10. When he tried on the right shoe, he screamed out ‘OUUUCH.‘

“That was it. His life was over right there and then. The nail in the shoe was tainted with cancer viruses and bacteria. If it pierced his skin, which it did, it was goodnight nurse.”There had been a series of high-profile assassinations of counter-culture figures in the United States in the late sixties, early seventies. By the time Bob Marley’s time came around, we thought subtlety was the order of the day. No more bullets and splattered brains.”

Mr. Oxley says he kept close contact with Marley during the final years of his life, ensuring the medical advice he received in Paris, London and the United States “would hasten his demise rather than cure him.” He died from cancer in May 1981. He was just 36 years old.

The final photo of Bob Marley, days before his death.
“The last time I saw Bob before he died he had removed the dreadlocks, and his weight was dropping like a stone,” he says.

“He was very withdrawn, unbelievably small. He was shrinking in front of us. The cancer had done it’s job.”

“The day he died in Miami was definitely one of the most difficult moments in my career. I felt real bad. For a long time I wasn’t comfortable with my part in his death. But eventually I came to realize it had to be done, for America.”

Biafra: Respect your old age – BNYL warns Lai Mohammed over comments on IPOB

 Biafra Nations Youth League, BNYL, has cautioned Minister of information, Lai Mohammed, over his comments that IPOB is dead.
The group warned that such declaration could lead to provocation in the South East and South South regions.
Mohammed had told newsmen that “the large turnout witnessed during the election has sounded the death knell on IPOB.
“I think what that proved really is that IPOB does not represent the good people of Anambra or any state in the South East.
“If truly they represented the people, the IPOB propaganda about the election really showed that they are not on ground.”
Reacting, BNYL Leader, Princewill Obuka, said “That old man does not know how determined the Biafrans are. He saw what happened during military raid.”
“Such resistance should have told them that Biafrans, if armed, would really consume Nigeria like Kanu was saying.
“He should respect his old age and turn attention to Boko Haram and Shiites”.
However, the group added that its ongoing grassroots engagements have been extended to various parts of Cross River.
“We have engaged mostly community youth leaders and even some community leaders in towns like Obudu, Bekwara, Ikom, and almost all the towns in Bakassi including ceded areas.
“What we have not done within the Cross River axis is meeting the paramount rulers but plans are on ground.
“In Rivers State we are organising a similar internal grassroots referendum programs in Ekpeye land of Ahoada East like we did in some towns in Akwa Ibom on the day we all stormed Onna to mark the death of our late leader, General Philip Effiong”.
Obuka added that the group is not inciting violence at the grassroots but detailing the people on progress of the Biafra struggle.
“We are doing what is expected of us. Our people have every right to know what is going on outside the grassroots.
“In places like Obanliku and Boki, there is poor network and people are anxious to know what is going on. We receive distress calls and complaints everyday from that part.
“We owe our people explanations, and much more engagements, which is why we initiated the internal referendum activities. In fact, many have built confidence on us and going back on Biafra independence pursuit will be difficult for us”.
The Chief of Army Staff, Lt.-Gen. Tukur Buratai, on Thursday, asked the Federal High Court in Abuja to trash a suit seeking to compel him to produce the ‘missing’ leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Mr. Nnamdi Kanu.
A team of lawyers representing the embattled pro-Biafra agitator had in the suit, prayed the court to order Buratai to produce their client either dead or alive.
The lawyers who were led by Mr Ifeanyi Ejiofor, told the court that they had not seen or heard from their client since September 14 when the Nigerian Army invaded his house “on a murderous raid, where life and mortar bullets were fired on unarmed and defenceless populace, leaving 28 persons dead and abducting many”.
Pursuant to section 40 of the Federal High Court Act, F12, LFN 2005 and section 6(6) (1) (4) of the 1999 constitution, as amended, Kanu’s lawyers applied for “an order of Habeas Corpus ad subjiciendum, commanding the Respondent (Buratai), to produce the Applicant in Court”.
However, in a counter-affidavit he filed in opposition to the suit, Buratai told the court that Kanu was never in custody of the Nigeria Army.
He maintained that contrary to claims in the suit, soldiers who were deployed to the South-East for ‘Operation Python Dance II, did not have any contact whatsoever with Kanu on September 12 or 14, or anytime thereafter as alleged.
The counter-affidavit read in part, “That the applicant (Kanu) is not and has never been in his custody or in the custody of any person, officer or institution receiving instruction directly or indirectly from him.
“That the applicant was not at any time whatsoever arrested, taken into custody or detained by the Officers and men of the Nigerian Army.
“That the officers and men of the Nigerian Army did not have any contact whatsoever or confrontation or any operational engagement with the applicant on September 12 or 14, 20l7 or any other date thereafter, contrary to the allegations in the affidavit in support of the application.
“That the allegation of invasion of the South-Eastern part of Nigeria by officers and men of the Nigerian Army, especially the applicant’s home and or residence is totally false.”
He told the court that during “a peaceful movement” that formed part of Operation Python Dance II, soldiers, on September 14, pursued a truck loaded with arms and ammunition into a compound which was identified in the suit as jointly owned by Kanu and his father.
He alleged that the fleeing truck and its occupants ran over Army barricade and defied soldiers’ order stopping them to be searched.
“That while on a peaceful movement on the said September 14, 2017, the soldiers randomly conducted stop-and-search operations as are necessary and it was during one of such exercises in Umuahia, Abia State, that it flagged down a truck, which as it turned out later, was loaded with arms and ammunitions of varying degrees and descriptions.
“Rather than comply with the stop order, the driver and other occupants of the truck recklessly ran over the barricade mounted on the road by the soldiers and sped off, whereupon the soldiers at the point gave a hot chase and called for reinforcement to enable them pursue and arrest the fleeing vehicle. The soldiers did not fire any shot at the fleeing truck in order to prevent the loss of lives.
“That the truck loaded with the arms and ammunition was pursued into a compound which has now been described in this application as belonging to and under the control of the applicant (Kanu) and his father.
“That it was the legitimate attempt by the officers and men of the Nigerian Army to arrest the fleeing occupants of the truck and impound the truck that precipitated the deliberate igniting of the ammunition in the truck by persons now believed to be IPOB members.
“That the act of the IPOB members resulted in sporadic explosions within the said applicant’s compound”, the affidavit further stated.
“Throughout the duration of the Operation Python Dance II, officers and men of the Nigerian Army obeyed the Rules of Engagement and Code of Conduct to the letter as there was no reported case of indiscriminate shooting, unlawful arrest, detention or torture, contrary to the wild, bland, untrue, incorrect, bogus and insipid allegations contained in or oozed out in the affidavit of Prince Mandela Umegborogu Esq.
“The allegations of firing of live bullets on the applicant’s relatives, killing of scores of persons, wounding and arrest of many, attack and invasion of applicant’s home, barricade at Isialangwa, arrest and torture of civilians by officers and me of the Nigerian Army, as stated by the deponent, are a figment of his imagination as same are not true.”
  

HOW LONG SHOULD YOU KILL AND IMPROVISHED OUR PROPHETS AND PEOPLE WHILE WE STAND AND LOOK ON, FOR THE SAKE OF ONE NIGERIA! STAND UP NOW AND SING THE SONG OF FREEDOM.THE REDEMPTION SONG! IT WAS LAST SUNG ON THE STREET OF SOWETO IN SOUTH AFRICA!

 
We will defeat one Nigeria of unstrained evil. We will defeat one Nigeria of robbing the South to feed the North. We will defeat all the political class in the south aiding and abetting the North and the British, to colonize all the Major and Micro Nations in the political and economic oversexed south and parts of the middle-belt. We shall overcome every individual supporting the Nigeria unity concept, to continue, to exist by deepened and destroy our lives and general humanity. We shall overcome their military and their Hausa-Fulani cum core-northern controlled armed forces and their other security agencies that kill armless IPOB Massob and other youth members of various self-determination groups in any parts of the failed Nigerian state, who are peacefully protesting, rallying or holding their meetings without any act of provocation of the enemies. This is the work of heartless vampires and demons in military uniforms. One Nigeria epitomizes carnage, butchery and primitive existence in human flesh. One Nigeria represent the rawest of horror and a frightful testimony of man’s inhumanity to man. Nigeria as a single sovereign state is evil personified beyond human comprehension. Nigeria is barbaric beyond extraordinary human reasoning; Nigeria is the largest concentration of the largest human beings, with spirit of conscienceless garb, murderous stint, inglorious greedy garments, and cowards. One Nigeria disciples in the South of Nigeria, as you are reading this message, you know them all. They live among us, some drink and eats with us and pretend that they are our friends and leaders, but they are not for us. They are never with us, but with those who do not want us to possess our land, our lives, our resources and our freedom. Some of them pretend to be speaking and fighting for us, but they were never with us, but they are always with the enemies playing politics of self, class, their games of sodomy and forcing their agenda on us. They are proxies’ and fronts of the enemies, and who are these enemies if not those forcing the unity of Nigeria on Regions that are no longer interested in a united Nigeria.
We are plunged together with them in a cage cum Zoo with our enemies. We come from a different world, our histories is different and espouse a different tradition. So, associating us with them as co-Nigerians is a farce and vain praises, because the truth is that, we are not all Nigerians, because we are different and the God who created us differently knew this, but the British whites think otherwise. I am Makanjuola Adigun Muhammed, a Yoruba Nationals and a huge friend and admirer of Biafra and Biafrans. Stop killing the Easterners because they possess the rights extended to them by God to be different from you and to openly choose that part to be separated from you because the Almighty creator is not a God of Compulsory unity. Nigeria current situation, is like a navigating ship that has lost its compass on the high sea and could never go forward and those pretending to possess the invincible prowess to navigate that ship out of nowhere, are arch-deceivers, corruption induced bigots, sheer opportunists, local conquistadores and carnivores in outer reflections. Some of them hate me with unlimited reservations but they are little to the judgments of God that awaits them around the corner. Let my people go! Let my people go so that they can reclaim their humanity and use their God given talents and knowledge to add values to their indigenous surrounding and the promotion of universal world values.
My positions and stand on the State and nature of the Nigeria State are unapologetic. I am an ethnic nationalist. I believe strong and unrepentantly in the right of the Yoruba ordinary people trapped in the South-West of Nigeria to have Oduduwa Republic and the right of the Easterners trapped in the South-South and the South-East to have Biafra if that is their wish. And I believe in the right of the Middle-Belt people to evolve into their own separate sovereign political identity if that will save them and protect their faiths and humanity and same to all ethnic nationality to exercise their right of self-determination if that is their wish. I hold strongly to the above belief and anything less than that is an assault on their freedom and eloquent testimony to servitude and slavery. I believe maybe not like the others that the sheer volume of innocent blood that has been spilled and shed on Nigeria soil and many in their millions who has been rendered useless, hungry, destitute and hopeless has made the miasma called one Nigeria, as it is presently constituted, irredeemable and repugnant to God.
Furthermore, it is not historically not right for certain misguided elements ,puppeteers and profiteers in Nigeria, to argued that since certain leaders ,either from Biafra and the Yoruba nation, are not in supports of the breakup of Nigeria , that such inevitable reality with not berth sooner than later. History in its course of interpretations of situation like that of Nigeria in other past climes that shared same contradictory distorted political miscarriage had also ended becoming defunct. History has always situated and defined a radical change and overthrow of a decadence political and economic community as a contest between the forces of enslavement as against the forces of freedom. Some of us did not attended the university only to graduate and becoming liability on the failures of that political society but to descent to the levels of questioning the factors and reasons behind the origin of certain injustices, inequalities and feudal colonialism in our political community and form steady positions and snowballing into pragmatic and practical action plans to stop the trend. My study of cultural history reconnected me back to my Yoruba National identity and the revolutionary beliefs in the workability of a Yoruba sovereign homeland that will take the Yoruba entire developmental strides from where the avatar Awo left it, to the pinnacle of contemporary modern world civilization and this is the hope Biafra also project towards humanity.
God Bless the Biafra and Yoruba Nation, and unites these people together in their course to be free from the one Nigeria rubbish forever.
If you are from the south and you want freedom of your people from Hausa-Fulani owned Nigeria start calling this British woman below or send her e-mail. Let us all in the South of  failed one Nigeria send this message of demanding for freedom to those who created the one Nigeria zoo.
PM Theresa May direct number +442079250918, +442078250918
+18884295500, +18769279941-3
UK House of commons Email: Webmaster@parliament.uk
Email: hlinfo@parliament.uk

freedom of biafra people